A Few Notes about Metropolis and Pandora’s Box
When
METROPOLIS
Was on PBS
There’s probably almost nobody who remembers this,
but once upon a time, long long ago,
PBS had a weekly series called
“PBS Movie Theater.”
On that series was a broadcast of Metropolis, and that was my introduction to the movie.
I would soon learn that the edition shown on “PBS Movie Theater”
was different from any other version of the film available in the US, then or now.
It was rather rare even in Europe.
![]() This is my forgery of the press photo, based upon several sources. I’m certain that it almost exactly matches the original.
Before we begin, let’s get a few things out of the way.
Everything you have heard about this movie —
its year-and-a-half shooting schedule,
its 36,000 extras,
its astronomical budget that bankrupted the studio,
Goebbels being so impressed by the film that he offered Fritz Lang control over the German film industry,
Fritz’s flight that very night to escape his fate —
and plenty other such tall tales, well, they’re all just a bunch of tall tales.
The true stories have long been easily available in the published record,
but some people just prefer sensationalism to facts.
By the way, I just discovered that Michael Organ’s Metropolis blog is up and running again:
https://metropolis1927archive.blogspot.com/.
Lots of good information there.
The best, and I mean the BEST, writing about Metropolis was by Ann J. Drummond
in her master’s thesis submitted to the University of Glasgow in July 1987,
Metropolis: An Historical and Political Analysis.
The BEST.
She supplies the contexts I had not even suspected that explain the principal idea behind the story.
She explains that the German Republic, especially in the early 1920’s,
had adopted the Taylorist methodology of factory production.
Every motion made by every employee was methodically governed to produce maximum efficiency, and thus maximum profits.
The people, working 10-hour shifts, lived like slaves and when on the clock performed exactly as automata, relentlessly.
Not a breath, not a moment, not a movement of a muscle was to be wasted.
Every movement was designed to maximize profits.
Anything less was considered laziness.
This regimen was leading to resentment and even to violent and armed revolt.
The recent Bolshevik revolution in Russia was serving as an inspiration.
Yet the industrialists in the Reichsverband der Deutschen Industrie (RDI, Reich Association of German Industry),
fiercely promoted their methodology and would not budge an inch.
Ufa was the studio that produced Metropolis,
and one of the Ufa board members, Paul Silverberg, gave a speech to the RDI in September 1926
(while Metropolis was being filmed) in which he urged “a peaceful arrangement with labour,”
a “social partnership.”
Drummond summarized
“that it would be in the longterm interests of capitalism to defuse working class opposition with limited reforms.”
Silverberg continued that “Industry is holding its hand out to labour.”
The other members of the RDI vehemently objected.
At the same time, labor organizations were beginning to argue that a consensus with capital would be the only route to peace.
This was also when Australian social psychologist Elton Mayo was arguing for
“better communications between workers and management,
the importance of supervision (in which the foreman played a key
role), and the recognition of informal group life within the
factory (which catered for the ‘natural’ social needs of the
worker and provided an outlet for frustrations and
dissatisfaction).”
Metropolis, like Mayo, took its stand for a centrist position,
and lashed out at both hypercapitalistic repression and at violent revolt.
It proposed consensus and coöperation as the only peaceful solution.
Once you have this knowledge under your belt, Metropolis makes a thousand times more sense,
because you can understand what it is referencing.
Absent this knowledge, Metropolis becomes nought more than a silly and contrived story with bad acting.
|